| My column continues to make public, for the
first time since World War II, the Army Service Forces 1943 Guide to the
Immediate and Maximum Utilization of Civilian Womanpower. The War Department
issued this document on November 10, 1943, for industry guidance in recruiting,
training and employing civilian women to meet emergency production requirements
necessitated by the wartime shortage of male workers in the United States.
Where applicable in presenting such original documentation, classified
pages have been declassified for publication.
As explained in previous columns, the US government
gave responsibility for industrial mobilization to the War Department,
which in turn tasked the Army Service Forces with many oversight and implementation
functions. The original pages of the guide evince the pervasive institutional
discrimination that women were forced to confront in their efforts to serve
the country. Such anti-feminine hostility is alluded to or mentioned
in several postwar accounts, but often minimized in favor of the patriotic
myth of the “greatest generation” harmoniously striving toward Victory
in united fashion with gender (and, to a lesser extent, racial) prejudices
cast aside.
The actual record, as shown in these pages,
more clearly reveal the innate government animosity toward women as a substitute
labor force on the home-front. Despite the overwhelming national
defense crisis and resulting dire need for female employees, the Army utilizes
portions of its guide to reemphasize prejudicial grievances which further
relegate women as a secondary and reluctant choice for employers.
The officially endorsed prejudices recorded
against women (see July II and August I columns) include perceived endangerment
of workplace health and efficiency; unique peculiarities in temperament
requiring differential treatment and special consideration on the job;
difficulties in classifying for the workplace; necessity for job reorganization
and rearrangement; shortcomings in attitude; deficiencies in outlook; endurance
problems; unsafe operating habits, inability to adjust personal lives while
working; other tendencies to cause special problems best avoided by hiring
and promoting men instead, and even the inability of most women to comprehend
a wartime emergency.
However, the most unfavorable female trait
threatening workplace productivity was the purported female propensity
toward turnover and absenteeism. This charge against women is repeated
throughout the guide. Within the pages reproduced in this column, it again
surfaces in Selection and Placement Methods (page 8). Unlike the placement
of servicemen during the war -- who were put into training or positions
primarily based on intelligence, aptitude and similar tests -- the Army
mandates that, in the case of women, “under no circumstances should placement
be made upon the basis of test findings alone.” Instead, “mature
woman interviewers” should be used to “disclose through personal interview,
home situations” (paragraph 2, 2d) because, as later explained on the same
page, “careful selecting and placement can be effective aides in controlling
turnover and absenteeism.”
The Army advises, “it is desirable to use mature
women interviewers who are understanding, tactful and skilled in obtaining
pertinent information from women applicants” and “particular attention
should be given to determining whether or not the applicant has made suitable
and fairly permanent arrangements for the care of her children and other
dependents before she is selected for a job.” The unstated but obvious
solicitation of “pertinent information” might also include a woman applicant’s
preferences in men and other personal matters, as well as the “mature woman’s”
assessment of appearance, social attitude and physical suitability.
The remaining three pages are devoted to Training.
Industrial department facilities, supervisory training personnel and induction
procedures are briefly discussed. The Army male leadership attitude toward
women as a distinct sub-group of humans is highlighted by the guide’s admonition,
“training of supervisors in the handling of women is important” (page 10).
Nevertheless, the guide incorporates many valuable standardized procedures
for training new personnel, including encouragement that “many of the new
supervisors will be women” and that “in some installations, women are showing
ability as instructors after being trained.” Such statements bear
witness to the progress of American women in their struggle for fair employment
during World War II.
.
Utilization Of Civilian Womanpower:
Selection and Placement / Training
.
Page 8:
Selection and Placement
click to enlarge
|
Page 9:
Training: Facilities
click to enlarge
|
Page 10:
Training: Personnel
click to enlarge
|
Page 11:
Training: Induction
click to enlarge
|
.
Copyright ©
2008 by Shelby L. Stanton - All rights reserved
All
materials on this website are protected by European and U.S. copyright
laws, and may not be reproduced, distributet, published or broadcast without
the prior written permission of the copyright holder. Permission granted
to reproduce for personal and educational use only. You may also download
and reproduce this material for research or private study. Commercial copying,
hiring, lending, etc., is prohibited. If copies are used for non-profit
educational purposes, do not remove any logo, trademark, copyright or other
notice from the copies and give full credit to Shelby L. Stanton.
|